War of Nerves: Chemical Warfare from World War I to

War of Nerves: Chemical Warfare from World War I to al-Qaeda [KINDLE] ✽ War of Nerves: Chemical Warfare from World War I to al-Qaeda Author Jonathan Tucker – Natus-physiotherapy.co.uk In this important and revelatory book, Jonathan Tucker, a leading expert on chemical and biological weapons, chronicles the lethal history of chemical warfare from World War I to the presentAt the tur In this important and revelatory book, Jonathan Nerves: Chemical Kindle Ô Tucker, a leading expert on chemical and biological weapons, chronicles the lethal history of chemical warfare from World War I to the presentAt the turn of the twentieth century, the rise of synthetic chemistry War of Kindle - made the large scale use of toxic chemicals on the battlefield both feasible and cheap Tucker explores the long debate over the military utility and morality of chemical warfare, from the first chlorine gas attack at Ypres into Hitler s reluctance to of Nerves: Chemical ePUB ´ use nerve agents he believed, incorrectly, that the US could retaliate in kind to Saddam Hussein s gassing of his own people, and concludes with the emergent threat of chemical terrorism Moving beyond history to the twenty first century, War of Nerves makes clear that we are at a crossroads that could lead either to the further spread of these weapons or to their ultimate abolition From the Trade Paperback edition.


10 thoughts on “War of Nerves: Chemical Warfare from World War I to al-Qaeda

  1. Viktor Viktor says:

    Excellent narrative which spans the entire history of chemical warfare, from its beginnings in WWI we just passed the 100th anniversary in April to the modern day terrorist threat The book is extremely detailed even from a chemistry standpoint which may discourage some readers, but I highly recommend it to anyone who is curious to learnabout modern warfare and politics I believe the author does well at remaining objective throughout the book, although at times he does seem to appro Excellent narrative which spans the entire history of chemical warfare, from its beginnings in WWI we just passed the 100th anniversary in April to the modern day terrorist threat The book is extremely detailed even from a chemistry standpoint which may discourage some readers, but I highly recommend it to anyone who is curious to learnabout modern warfare and politics I believe the author does well at remaining objective throughout the book, although at times he does seem to approach the issue of chemical warfare from a moral and ethical, black and white stance, which it clearly is not there are many shades of gray to the argument


  2. Lizzie Lizzie says:

    A comprehensive military history of chemical weapons from their root in WWI through 2006, War of Nerves does a fantastic job of illustrating how organizational imperatives and domestic politics play just as strong of role in weapon development programs as does defined military need or strategic imperatives Tucker is by no means polemical, but he does convey that the meta argument over deterrence often had little connection at best to military requirements, preparedness, and technical constraint A comprehensive military history of chemical weapons from their root in WWI through 2006, War of Nerves does a fantastic job of illustrating how organizational imperatives and domestic politics play just as strong of role in weapon development programs as does defined military need or strategic imperatives Tucker is by no means polemical, but he does convey that the meta argument over deterrence often had little connection at best to military requirements, preparedness, and technical constraints However, he also illustrates how close several states were to CW deployment as part of a broad conventional campaign, most strikingly Nazi Germany in 1945, combatant Arab states during the 1973 war with Israel, and Iraq in 1991 Tucker argues that in each case awareness of asymmetrical capabilities especially inability to protect their own populations from retaliation prevented otherwise logical CW use for military purposes If you accept that argument which Tucker does not flesh out with much sourcing or research of his own then he does an insufficient job of pivoting in the last chapter in support of the CWC and the existence of norms as the best tool to prevent future CW use I m not taking a position on either side, but rather noting Tucker s meticulous evidence itself undermines what appear in the last chapter to be his policy preferences.This is a highly relevant book to frame the pervasive use of chemical weapons in Syria today as the international community stands by, unable or unwilling to enforce the norm It is reminiscent of the Italian use of CW against Abyssinia as the League of Nations wrung its hands, a historical analogy that should deeply worry anyone concerned over the stability of today s international system


  3. Enrique Enrique says:

    This book provides a good comprehensive overview of the development and use of chemical weapons staring with World War One For anyone that studies weapons of mass destruction this book is a must have.


  4. Erik Erik says:

    An excellent top down telling of chemical weapon warfare from 1914 to 2007 Easy to read, extremely compelling, and smart enough to let the reader decide, this was a non fiction book i could power through without getting too mentally exhausted There is some chemistry, but you arent required to have prior knowledge Chemical weaponry has an interesting history in that its been partially decommissioned far further in arms reduction than nuclear.Some parts of the title are covered in muchd An excellent top down telling of chemical weapon warfare from 1914 to 2007 Easy to read, extremely compelling, and smart enough to let the reader decide, this was a non fiction book i could power through without getting too mentally exhausted There is some chemistry, but you arent required to have prior knowledge Chemical weaponry has an interesting history in that its been partially decommissioned far further in arms reduction than nuclear.Some parts of the title are covered in muchdetail to than others, and while i can understand certain events have less to write about, I would have preferred a wider scope.He focuses only on the main weapons specifically developed to militarize for the purposes of killing Agent Orange and environmental chemicals are only briefly mentioned I felt the author minimized the destructiveness of agent orange in the way he presented Police agents such as tear gas or incapacitating gasses are not mentioned Frustatingly, Tucker retells an incident of how Russian military pumped narcotic gasses to end a hostage situation without going intodetail about that wider class of substances.I particularly enjoyed the part about the Japanese Cult gas attacks, as well as world war II I think theres a lothere than the small view we got which is largely from a cold war perspective Beggars cant be choosers this is the best book out there on chemical weapons


  5. Adam Adam says:

    This was an excellent history of the use of chemical weapons throughout the world in the twentieth and early twenty first century As a work of history, this book is extremely detailed and shows an in depth picture of how chemical weapons have been used by both governments and on state actors from World War I to the present day However, one flaw in the book is the author s argument that existing international norms against chemical weapons be enforced further, and thatagreements be establ This was an excellent history of the use of chemical weapons throughout the world in the twentieth and early twenty first century As a work of history, this book is extremely detailed and shows an in depth picture of how chemical weapons have been used by both governments and on state actors from World War I to the present day However, one flaw in the book is the author s argument that existing international norms against chemical weapons be enforced further, and thatagreements be established to prevent their use This is no guarantee of non use even by governments that are signatories to such agreements However, in spite of the flawed argument, this was an excellent, informative work of history that is recommended to anyone who wishes to learnabout the topic


  6. Pooja Kashyap Pooja Kashyap says:

    One of the best book on chemical warfare, giving glimpse on 2003 Iraq War and the current threat of chemical terrorism These super toxic poisons have no peaceful uses, they must not have been created in the first place Tucker is trying his best by presenting the never ending ill effects of these nerve racking agents but unfortunately the governments do not seem to be getting much wiser.


  7. Beth Beth says:

    If you ve branched Chem Corps in the military its an Ok read I think it focuses a little bit too much on the R D and then the demilitarization side, and not so much on the what were chemical soldiers doing at the time side, but its still a good history lesson Probably really boring to anybody else If you ve branched Chem Corps in the military its an Ok read I think it focuses a little bit too much on the RD and then the demilitarization side, and not so much on the what were chemical soldiers doing at the time side, but its still a good history lesson Probably really boring to anybody else


  8. Chris Chris says:

    Excellent book I would highly recommend this book this to anyone seeking a knowledge base in chemical warfare or really anyone interested in military history Very well written


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *