Marges de la philosophie PDF/EPUB ↠ Marges de ePUB

Marges de la philosophie ❮PDF / Epub❯ ✈ Marges de la philosophie ⚣ Author Jacques Derrida – Впервые на русском языке выходит книга Поля философии 1972 одна из базовых работ Жака Деррида — крупнейшего со Впервые на русском языке выходит книга Поля философии одна из базовых работ Жака Деррида — крупнейшего современного мыслителя интеллектуального лидера Парижской школы – е организатора Группы исследований в области философского образования и Международного философского колледжа Им создано около книг русскоязычному читателю уже знаком ряд работ Деррида О грамматологии Голос и феномен Письмо и различие Позиции Шпоры Стили Ницше Почтовая открытка От Сократа к Фрейду и далее Призраки Маркса Marges de ePUB í Маркс и сыновья Диссеминация и др В оригинальной философской концепции известной как деконструктивизм Деррида интерпретирует мотивы философских размышлений Гегеля Ницше Гуссерля Фрейда Хайдеггера и др Объектом ревизии для Деррида становится вся классическая западноевропейская философская традицияНовый перевод представляет собой собрание текстов которые воплощают неподражаемые образцы деконструкции классических философских произведений а также разворачивают рискованные практики проблематизации всей западноевропейской метафизической традиции ставя под вопрос речь и письмо язык и текст дискурс и метафору перформативность и истину Эта игра пределаперехода краевграниц до сих пор остается в фокусе современных интеллектуальных дискуссийКнига адресована не только философам но и специалистам других отраслей гуманитарного знания а также всем читателям интересующимся современной западной мыслью.

10 thoughts on “Marges de la philosophie

  1. Geoff Geoff says:

    I wasn't going to add this to the shelves because I don't really have any intention of reading it any time soon especially because I'm not at all in any way prepared to read Derrida Fine But then I saw it was on that Pompous Books to Read in Public listopia and well if there's anything that's gonna make me add a book it's to spite that fuckin' Pompous Books to Read in Public list which in and of itself is a pompous list Any case look what's on there Thucydides? Mrs Dalloway? Little Fucking Dorrit by Charles Dickens? Chekhov? Rilke? Musil? Valeria Luiselli?? Tolstoy and Dostoevsky for fuck's sake?? Paradise Lost? Motherfuckin' Madame Bovary is pompous?? Solzhenitsyn? WEB Du Bois? Rebecca West? Goddamn Homer?? These are pompous hipster reads?? I am truly baffled Anyway I won't be reading Margins of Philosophy in the near future but fuck you PBTRIP list

  2. Rickeclectic Rickeclectic says:

    Contains one of the two most important writings by Derrida White Mythology this essay is a little less accessible than Plato's Pharmacy from the book Dissemination but still fairly clearReuires a bit of reading on Aristotle but fairly accessible partsThe notion is that philosophy is really a kind of mythology that has been bleached of its context and so becomes pureThis essay has an extended discussion of metaphor and how metaphors play in philosophical texts The goal is to show that philosophy while aiming at truth uses metaphor in the extreme to not only attempt to strip language of context and therefore contextual meaning but by doing so to create its own mythology or truth totally devoid of contextThe essay is a very effective criticism of any ability to provide philosophical truth and a strong criticism of Western philosophy at least up to Kant The essay uestions our ability to do philosophy at all and yet shows how everything we do is embedded in metaphor

  3. Iris Iris says:

    I want to like this book than I do It just feels so much dated and less articulate than some of Derrida's other work The book follows dead ends as often as it follows invigorating insights; it reads like a notebook en route to a book rather than a final productMaybe this was a deliberate choice seeing how much the text emphasizes philosophy's incapacity to enclose itself and establish its disciplinary boundaries While he performs the failure though he doesn't take a single step away from it He gestures toward a world outside the bounds of philosophical discourse in which it would be embedded but not isolated but the text remains entrenched within the philosophy he critiues The intense careful concern with philosophy's inadeuacy just feels like the sterile mirror of its fantasy of adeuacy Derrida doesn't really look beyond the philosophical domain he dwells within he just highlights all its shortcomingsThere are gems within the book to be sure Even if a notebook it is the notebook of an insightful and careful mind If you care about the specific topics he is addressing be it metaphor in Aristotle or sense and meaning in Husserl he says smart things that are worth taking under consideration In the long run though I just feel like there are better and fruitful avenues of development than those Derrida takes here

  4. Stuart Macalpine Stuart Macalpine says:

    Brilliant work on Plato for example takes uite a lot of re reading but brilliant in the insight of its thought once you get there

  5. Conor Slattery Conor Slattery says:

    Derrida's essay on differance is in my opinion his single greatest acheivement The way that he addresses the ontological differance and follows the trace even to that original genesis is truly something to behold This is not the place to start for Derrida but if you are interested in Derrida and Heidegger this is the place to go

  6. Egor Sofronov Egor Sofronov says:

    Marvelous Jackie is incredible I wish I could read with the same delicacy and penetration

  7. Phillip Phillip says:

    Margins organizes itself in large part around the idea of the metaphorical consistency of metaphysical thinking as a repetition of physics; metaphysics metaphorically uses physis to give itself consistency or a consistently present body While metaphysics might understand itself as based in and dealing with concepts or to be occurring only at the level of ideas in actuality it is constantly deploying physical metaphors to guarantee the continuity of its presence Presence would be a metaphorically continuous body which would constitute the consistency of truth conceived of as metaphysically certain At the same moment metaphysics presents itself as being nothing but an ideal and conceptual proposition Metaphysics appears to be practiced purely at the level of concepts and ideas however in using metaphors in the constitution of its sense it actually and covertly relies on a fabricated metaphorically physical continuity or presence This presence underwrites the continuity of the truth of its ideas Because of this Derrida argues philosophy has always based itself in an exclusion of the metaphorical as a way of thinking not compatible with concepts Metaphors are the other of concepts metaphysical thinking and metaphysical ideality cannot be seen to be implicated with them In Derrida's reading however it constantly is as it is the concept's location in metaphysical space which allows one concept to be intelligible from another That is in the last instance it isn't the internal coherence of the idea or concept which distinguishes it from other concepts or ideas but rather just the metaphoric corporal continuity which it is secretly presumed to possess In this sense metaphysics is “white mythology” the mythology practiced by the white man as that culture which understood as eminently 'rational' and defined by the absence of mythology in its thought All of Derrida's thought takes place in a kind of 'reprojected space' or he derives the sense of his ideas in terms of a conceptual space where the events which define the the pre understood coherence of metaphysics would be taking place This space is like the unconscious of metaphysics but thinking this space and its objects as a type of insubstantial model is the basis for the practice of deconstruction So while there is the conceptual level of metaphysics in which for instance nature and culture or even concept and metaphor itself conducts themselves as a series of opposed tropes or concepts there is a 'hidden' sublimated conceptual background which metaphysics both disavows but uses For Derrida then thinking the problem of metaphysics involves thinking this relationship between a consciously represented conceptual level and a disavowed unconscious substantial metaphor

  8. Alex Obrigewitsch Alex Obrigewitsch says:

    A very important collection of essays from DerridaThe play of words themes and ideas disseminated and disseminating across these essays and his other works linking them through the progressive enaction of deconstruction is well highlighted through this collective text'Differánce' is perhaps a good place to begin reading Derrida As good as one may get perhaps for deconstruction plays throughout our thought and we find ourselves always already familiar with Derrida though never now

  9. Ryan Ryan says:

    This is alright It contains the essay Differance which is key to the development of poststructuralism Not as interesting as others

  10. Alamgeer Alamgeer says:

    here derrida examines the thought of saussaure rousseau kant hegel nietzche husserl and others in deconstructive way

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *