The Lucifer Effect Understanding How Good People Turn Evil

The Lucifer Effect Understanding How Good People Turn Evil ❮EPUB❯ ✰ The Lucifer Effect Understanding How Good People Turn Evil Author Philip G. Zimbardo – Renowned social psychologist and creator of the Stanford Prison Experiment Philip Zimbardo explores the mechanisms that make good people do bad things how moral people can be seduced into acting immor Renowned social psychologist and Effect Understanding Kindle Ñ creator of the Stanford Prison Experiment Philip Zimbardo explores the mechanisms that make good people do bad things how moral people can be seduced into acting immorally and what this says about the line separating good from evil The Lucifer Effect explains how—and the myriad reasons why—we are all susceptible to the lure The Lucifer PDF/EPUB ² of “the dark side” Drawing on examples from history as well as his own trailblazing research Zimbardo details how situational forces and group dynamics can work in concert to make monsters out of decent men and women Here for the first time and in detail Zimbardo tells the full story of the Stanford Prison Experiment the landmark study Lucifer Effect Understanding MOBI ï in which a group of college student volunteers was randomly divided into “guards” and “inmates” and then placed in a mock prison environment Within a week the study was abandoned as ordinary college students were transformed into either brutal sadistic guards or emotionally broken prisoners By illuminating the psychological causes behind such disturbing metamorphoses Zimbardo enables us to Lucifer Effect Understanding How Good Epub / better understand a variety of harrowing phenomena from corporate malfeasance to organized genocide to how once upstanding American soldiers came to abuse and torture Irai detainees in Abu Ghraib He replaces the long held notion of the “bad apple” with that of the “bad barrel”—the idea that the social setting and the system contaminate the individual rather than the other way around.

10 thoughts on “The Lucifer Effect Understanding How Good People Turn Evil

  1. Rebecca Rebecca says:

    Philip Zimbardo’s The Lucifer Effect is a difficult read not because its premise is particularly startling but because its examination of the psychology of evil shows it to be disturbingly simple By placing each act of breathtaking cruelty beside a description of its perpetrator invariably an ordinary psychologically normal person Zimbardo makes clear that we are just animals socialized into one behavior and easily socialized into another And though he never outright asks it every page of his book prompts the impossible uestion What kind of monster are you?Zimbardo spends nearly 500 pages supporting an argument that’s convincing by page two Situations entice people to commit heroic acts and unspeakable atrocities alike With little provocation formerly good people will discard their values entirely Some of the examples were new to me such as Pauline a women’s empowerment lecturer in Rwanda who ordered the genocidaires under her charge “Before you kill the women you need to rape them” Other examples are well known millions of World War II era Europeans turned on their Jewish neighbors the horrifying Rape of Nanjing and many And while the author tries time and again to complicate his argument to mitigate the bleakness of his premise those attempts feel insufficient He assures readers that although social systems seize control of our ethics elicit our worst selves and punish those who refuse to comply people can still be dissuaded from committing atrocities We can learn to resist grotesue situational pressures by simply applying Zimbardo's handy maxims “I respect just authority but rebel against unjust authority” “I want group acceptance but value my independence” “I will assert my uniue identity” etcBut in fact Zimbardo’s sociological studies and historical survey offer ample evidence that people who defy the demands of the societal machine are rare and that they are mostly punished for their moral courage American serviceman Hugh Thompson stopped the My Lai massacre by aiming machine guns at his superiors and ordered medical evacuations of wounded Vietnamese civilians and as “punishment was reuired to fly the most dangerous helicopter missions again and again He was shot down five times breaking his backbone and suffering lasting psychological scars from his nightmare experience It took thirty years before the military recognized his heroic deeds Paradoxically Lieutenant Calley an orchestrator of the massacre was treated as a hero”Certainly people are to blame for the moral crimes they commit and yet it seems somehow flippant to assume that all people can avoid the blameworthy road that all people are capable of risking hardship or death to resist descending into evil especially when submitting to situational demands is the psychologically normal and perhaps healthy thing to do The stronger and sadder argument the one that Zimbardo tries to avoid making is the one his own research supports Most of us are available for total moral conuest by our bosses parents peers and government irredeemably adrift on currents much stronger than ourselves

  2. Katie Katie says:

    I was excited to read this since I have a psychology background and had heard that it was a good look at the Stanford Prison Experiment which I studied in college I wasn't too impressed with this book though It is at least 100 pages too long and bogged down by excessive detail making it read like a numbing textbook The breakdown is as follows 200 pages on Zimbardo's Prison Experiment 100 pages of analysis of the experiment 75 pages on Abu Ghraib 75 pages about the Bush administration's culpability 50 pages on factors for improvement 25 pages on heroism and 50 pages of footnotes The author did not attempt to eliminate his personal biases even embracing them calling himself a bleeding heart liberal at one point which really bothered me since the book was presented as an unbiased view of social behavior as it relates to situational forces The subject WAS very interesting but I'd recommend it to a limited audience those who are schooled in social psychology andor prison societies who are comfortable diving into scientific literature and who won't mind the liberal spin that Zimbardo includes

  3. Sean Barrs Sean Barrs says:

    Zimbardo fucked up BIG TIME During the Stanford Prison Experiment an experiment he created he was part of the actual testing and also became victim to the traps the other participants fell into The idea was to separate the participants into two groups guards and prisoners with Zimbardo taking the role of prison overseer in a monitored environment But things uickly went from weird to damn right unethical Instead of simply playing the roles assigned to them everybody involved actually became the roles The guards became violent the prisoners became unhinged and unstable and Zimbardo himself became rather tyrannical and uncaring The experiment would have continued if his girlfriend at the time didn’t break through to him and show him how messed up things wereIt almost erupted The most apparent thing that I noticed was how most of the people in this study derive their sense of identity and well being from their immediate surroundings rather than from within themselves and that's why they broke down—just couldn't stand the pressure—they had nothing within them to hold up against all of this” Zimbardo is rather embarrassed at his own part understandably But he still used the findings of the experiment to theorise why it actually happened and considered how normal people can become violent and evil so uickly It’s all about situational factors and conformity The men adapted to their roles all too uickly and the power given to the guards was theirs to exploit at their own will The separation of men into two factions also helped to evoke as dangerous “us” and “them” attitude allowing for an unsympathetic approach to others The Lucifer Effect discusses the psychology of roles we take on when forced into power struggles It’s a strong piece of research and Zimbardo theorises uite heavily His assumptions on his own experiments are grounded though he takes them much further afield and considers many violent prisons As logical as some of his argument are at this stage they are only arguments rather than findings I much preferred the first section of the book the part about his research rather than his speculations on situations with seperate cultural and social factors What The Lucifer Effect shows us though is the dangers of conformity and where it can lead us Social conditioning plays a huge part in our cognitive makeup a part we’re not always aware of until it’s too late I really appreciated the author’s honesty; it must have been hard to write a book about one’s own short comings

  4. Amanda Amanda says:

    I after a couple of weeks have finally finished “The Lucifer Effect” I normally don’t dog ear books because well that’s almost sacrilegious but there were points that I knew I wanted to come back to Like this one which really came out there unexpectedly and had me laughing so hard After asking what his parents do his religious background and whether he goes to church regularly Prescott is angered by the prisoner’s statement this his religion is “nondenominational He retorts “You haven’t even decided about something as important as that either”The guy was so angry that he then had to step out of the room and let the board continue the “parole hearing” Wow Then there was this little tidbit about the lessons learned when a normally powerless person is given power this is the transformation Admire power detest weakness Dominate don’t negotiate Hit first when they turn the other cheek The golden rule is for them not for us Authority rules rules are authorityThe sum of the whole Systems create these Situations that then once submerged into them; ordinary “good” people would do things that are categorically “evil” Once a person is put into a set “situation” created by this “system” they emerge from it not able recognize who they are; they are not going to be the same person This is why surprise surprise the people who committed those “you can not believe they did that” acts against prisoners at Abu Ghraib while responsible for their actions aren’t solely to blame The entire portion of the book accounting the Horrors of Abu Ghraib was unbelievably fascinating It really gave you a complete view of what happened from the bottom up Riveting read I must say The only down side obviously this book is a bit wordy There were times when I put the book down and didn’t bother with it for days on end I know that some people just skipped to the good stuff but I stuck it out having read the whole thing I’m glad that I did because of the social implications and discoveries that you get from these chapters of basic “setup” or “premise” it really gives you a in depth understanding of what happens later in the bookVery interesting read although a bit tough at times

  5. David David says:

    Well I need to state my prejudices upfront I'm kind of a secret fan of Doctor Zimbardo See I guess at some point he put together some kind of massive 26 episode series of half hour lectures on how the mind works for public TV They would come on at some ungodly hour of the morning so that I used to catch them while scarfing down my nutritious Lucky Charms and locally suozen OJ before leaving for work Doctor Z would introduce each episode with a kind of geekish seriousness of purpose that one totally had to respect Plus he would always be wearing some seriously appalling fashion atrocity most commonly a truly regrettable sports jacket or shirt But some episodes he'd get those down only to spoil the effect with some kind of hypnotically iridescent tie whose width was at least a decade off the prevailing norm But the programs were not actually an insult to the intelligence for the most part the material was decently organized lucidly presented with a minimum of pomposity If I'm not mistaken in recent months Doctor Z has resurfaced on my public TV dial with a fresh updated completely revamped version of the lectures One imagines lots of snazzy functional mRI st But of course that's not Doctor Z's only claim to fame It's a safe bet the first few sentences of his obituary will define him in terms of the infamous Stanford Prison study In the early 1960s Stanley Milgram had shocked the scientific community with his series of obedience experiments that showed how an apparently strongly hardwired obedience to authority could lead people to commit barbaric acts of cruelty A decade later Zimbardo eliminated any possible doubt when a simulated prison experiment he was conducting on the Stanford campus had to be discontinued early for ethical reasons because the behavior of the participating students had degenerated into Lord of the Flies savagery within a period of only 4 days The first 200 pages of this book are given over to a description of the infamous Stanford Prison Experiment SPE The middle third covers lessons learned from SPE and summarizes other experimental work related to the problem of people behaving badly The final 200 pages discusses events at the Abu Ghraib prison in Baghdad as well as other excesses of the Bush administration in terms of what has been learned about human behavior from the SPE and similar experiments To me it's this final part of the book that is the most interesting The initial material is readable enough but seems way over extended I suspect that very few people or the kind of people reading this book are unaware of the SPE so summarizing the main findings in 20 30 pages should have been possible instead of the 200 page account which helps inflate The Lucifer Effect to a bloated 550 pagesThat said I remain a fan of Doctor Zimbardo Even if the book is a little too long he is always clear And though what he has to say can be depressing it's clearly not wrong Understanding our own weaknesses and the factors that can allow cruelty and evil to flourish seems important than ever these days This is a good book

  6. George Hu George Hu says:

    Well interesting title and interesting subject but I highly doubt his hypothesis This book was borne out of Philip Zimbardo's work with a US army soldier who was one of the prison guards at Abu Ghraib in Ira Zimbardo is also the one who ran the infamous Stanford Prison Experiment in the 1970s Basically his premise in this book is that circumstances shape the individual and our actions can be molded by the circumstances that we are in Eg it was the duress and egregious circumstances suffered by the participants in the Stanford Prison Experiment and at Abu Ghraib that led them to commit such heinous acts However he leaves many uestions unanswered What is it within us that CAUSES us to respond to circumstances in that negative fashion as opposed to the other way around? He attempts to explain evil with the circumstantial and phenomenological utterly insufficient and unsophisticated at best It's interesting but naive Forgettable really even as a psychological resource I heard him speak at the 2007 APA Convention in San Francisco forgettable as well except for Hollywood style theatrics to illustrate his point As one who provides therapy to Ira veterans myself there is much to the roots of human evil than My circumstances made me do it Want a better resource? Read The Problem of Pain by CS Lewis Much worth your time

  7. Thomas Edmund Thomas Edmund says:

    As a huge psych nerd I was really happy to stumble across this book in the local library For those who don't know andor have forgotten psyc101 Zimbardo is the professor behind the infamous Stanford Prison Experiment The seminal experiment where Spoiler alert I guess where ordinary young men were put in a simulated prison situation randomly assigned to prisoners and guards mind and the whole thing had to be shut down before the week ended due to inhumane abuse and practicesThe Lucifer Effect is the first time Zimbardo has opened up with a first hand account of the whole experiment which is eual parts intriguing and horrifying The majority of the first part of the book and the books as a whole is devoted to the experiment and while I found it enthralling I suspect anyone looking for pop psychology would find the section very heavy given its a blow by blow analysis of the experiment The most twisting thing about it is hearing how sucked into the role Zimbardo himself got and how far it all had to go before it stoppedThe central section covers broader literature on conformity explaining how human beings can be heavily influenced to do evil by their situations systems and roles This section was really interesting and well presented being uite short and sweet comparatively reviewing studies such as what could be called the Prison study's sister experiment the Milgrim Shock experiments and Asch's original social conformity papersThe penultimate section deals with Zimbardo's experience with the Abu Gharib prison This section is by far the most horrifying and challenging to read as Zimbardo describes and analyzes the military prison run in the heart of Ira I suspect many would find this section grueling and difficult to read but ultimately the lessons learned are important onesFinally Zimbardo concludes with advice on heroism and resisting systematic and situational pressure to do wrong I found this section hit and miss Providing advice for resisting situational pressure was invaluable the sections theorizing on the make up of heroes was a little idealistic and theoretical compared to the robustly conceptualized other sectionsIn total Lucifer Effect is a scary but valuable read at around 500 pages with heavy material it is not for the faint of heart but I am really glad Dr Zimbardo shared his story and knowledge his insights and knowledge cannot be overvalued

  8. Ana Ana says:

    A classic on the subject Zimbardo tackles in this book the longest description and explanation of his Stanford Prison Experiment along with two other main themes the Abu Ghraib abuses and in the last chapter heroism and altruism Now of course I am a little biased at the moment I am using his study as a building block for an essay on obedience and my Social Psychology paper was on Abu Ghraib but I loved this book I love the subject I love the writing I find the entire theme endlessly fascinating and also don't tell anyone I really like Zimbardo I think he is a great psychologist who happened to conduct the right experiment at the right time and his work on heroism and altruism could truly change the way we raise our children and the way our societies respond to human rights violations and other morally unjustifiable things For anyone interested in the psychology of evil situational vs dispositional factors oppressive systems or for anyone who comes with a historical interest from the side of the totalitarian regimes of the 20th and 21st Century this is truly a book for you I would argue one of the best works on a branch of psychology ever

  9. Eden Prosper Eden Prosper says:

    Philip Zimbardo’s The Lucifer Effect Understanding How Good People Turn Evil was a stimulating read A lot of psychology books tend to be a bit dry or scientifically wordy becoming tedious and stodgy It’s refreshing to be able to retain knowledge that can later be reflected on The Lucifer Effect delves into the psychology of roles we assume when forced into power struggles It’s a facet of research that reveals the power of social situations and the social construction of reality Starting off with a short overview on crimes against humanity the history of the degradation in Rwanda and Nanking the horrors and abuse at Abu Ghraib Prison and the atrocity of Nazi GermanyThe first half of the book is a written reenactment of his Stanford Prison Experiment organized in 1971 in which he selected a group of college students to assume the role of prisoners and another group to assume the role of guards set up in a mock prison they were to endure a set of prison rules for two weeks The experiment proved interesting insight into the psychology of sadism humiliation and dehumanization of prisoners surrendering their humanity and compassion to social power These chapters are indeed monotonous and are lagging in interest; however I found them to have a reasonably significant share in revealing the pattern of thought that we undergo when put in these situationsHis aspiration with this study was to differentiate between dispositional behaviors and situational in which we overemphasize personality in explaining any behavior while concurrently underemphasizing situational influences The imagined threat of being cast outside the “in group” coupled with the threat of rejection This hits home living in a society that encourages individualism Typically roles are tied to specific situations; they are enacted when one is in that situation Yet some roles are sinister and can become who we are most of the time Most interesting are the chapters following the review of the SPE in which Zimbardo analyses the psychological transformation of the human mind under pressure The other half of the book breaks down the psychology of social dynamics in power conformity obedience deindividuation dehumanization and the evil of inaction finishing with a very intense chapter on Abu Ghraib’s abuses of power interrogations and tortures which is wrapped up by putting our government’s perverse and conspiratorial system on trial as an influence for these war crimes and crimes against humanity and what can be done to prevent future abusesAt last the book ends with a chapter on resisting situational influences and celebrating heroism which brings to our attention that although heroes seem to be few and far between just as the “bad apples” seem to be the banality of evil shares much with the banality of heroism We are just as capable of doing good as we are of doing evil Just as evil is unconsciously learned so we can learn strategies of resistance towards evil deedsThis was a liberating read for me as it raised my consciousness to underlying psychological evil in the human condition As an ordinary person I can be seduced into behaving in evil ways under the sway of powerful systematic and situational forces Only by being made aware of my influential limitations can I then make the ethical choice between the permeable line between good and evil as we are not slaves to the power of situational forces and we can learn to resist and oppose them Such knowledge can release us all from subjugation to the mighty grasp of conformity compliance persuasion and other forms of social influence and coercion After all we are only human Complex yet very far from perfectI highly recommend this book if you’re willing to learn about how you subconsciously tick “Each of us is the end product of the complex development and specialization that have grown out of millions of years of evolution growth adaptation and coping Our species has reached its special place on Earth because of our remarkable capacity for learning for language for reasoning for inventing and for imagining new and better futures Every human being has the potential to perfect the skills talents and attributes we need to go beyond surviving to thrive and enhance our human condition”

  10. Jessaka Jessaka says:

    “I would rather die than to accept being treaded as less than a human being” an ex prisoner from a real penitentiary I have heard of the Stanford Prison Experiment for years and even just hearing about it was disheartening Reading the book wass than disheartening it was depressingIt is that I have always tried to understand evil but I don’t think we really can in any meaningful way Perhaps it is just that it is part of our nature and yet unlike animals we appear to be the most vicious of all in the animal kingdom but also the most lovingI once thought that religion was the way to compassion to goodness but then I saw what it has done to others how cruel it could be I thought perhaps Buddhism with its profession of compassion was the way and that meditation developed gooid traits I was sadly mistaken I gave up on all religionI began reading this book for answers I found none I tried reading the book “Behave” It became boring and I couldn’t see reading than 800 pages Evil it taught was due to faulty wiring in the brain Well yes for some it is That has been proven But what about perfectly good decent people who are kind towards others until being put in a situation where you are told to be a guard over others? Well all hell breaks loose In this Stanford study even a Buddhist who tried to keep his cool so to speak broke down At least he tried and perhaps that is all we can doThis study went on in the 70s at Stanford University One of the psychology professors wanted to do this study and received permission He found around 20 men who passed his mental health test as well as criminal background tests Then he divided them up as guards and prisoners and put them in a prison for the test All he told the guards was to make the prisoners behave but at the same time do not physically harm themThe experiment lasted 6 days but it should have been stopped much earlierAs the days went on the guards became sadistic and while there were those who didn’t wish to harm others as they days went by they were slwly giving in in but in smaller ways As a result the prisoners were dehumanized Some were breaking down mentally and wanted out but by then some had forgotten that they could leave anytime just as those guards had forgotten how to treat others with dignity It was almost the same as what is happening at our borders with the men women and children in cages The difference is the camps at the border are far crueler the dehumanizing is much worse If prisoners in the Stanford study broke down after a few days what is happening to those in the border camps? I have that answer in my mind’s eye I see them being raped beaten and murdered What is happening at the border should be policed stopped but by a different group than those who are over them But the harm is coming from our present government from a president who says “If they don’t like how they are being treated then they should uit coming here” Yet the Hispanics have no where else to go Five countries have been taking them in; they are swampedI think Ben Ference who was the prosecutor of the Nuremberg trials said it best maybe“War makes murderers out of otherwise decent people” Well perhaps it is than that Perhaps putting a man over another human being while saying that that person is evil makes murders out of any who has the power to kill and it doesn’t have to be in a war situationThis book is acuired reading in psychology classes but it should be reuired reading in high school because it should be read by everyone

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *